I loved the book The Girl on the Train by
Paula Hawkins, and to me, the movie does an excellent job of bringing the book
to life. Emily Blunt is superb as Rachel, a boozy unreliable narrator.
She rides the train every day but is she really going to work. She can see out
over her ex-house that her ex-husband (a creepy Justin Theroux) has with his
new wife (Rebecca Ferguson – always good) and baby girl. Then there are the
neighbors – the perfect couple that Rachel fantasize about. Meagan (new
hot It Girl Haley Bennett) ends up dead. Say what? How, why, and
did Rachel see something?
It’s a convoluted puzzle with Allyson Janney as the
detective who questions Rachel’s integrity, report, and reliability.
Throw in a therapist for Meagan – was she having an affair with him?
Cheating, hot babysitter, and so much more. The book was intense
and gave an added layer to the story. It could convey the confusion. The film
does a very good job of giving us a back and forth thread – it bounces between
characters and Rachel’s drunken interpretation of events.
All in all, Emily Blunt is the key to The Girl on the
Train. She’s a fine actress who truly embodied the character and keeps
us both hating and rooting for her. She adds a vulnerability to the written
character. I don’t think the switch from London to New York was
necessary, but it worked okay. I liked this film and I do recommend reading the
book too. Cover all bases
Hi Joanne - I have a feeling the book would make a good read ... as I think the film will be good - but the book better. Emily Blunt is an excellent actress ... cheers Hilary
ReplyDeletebooks generally are the best
DeleteI have heard of the book and movie, but haven't read it or seen it. Sounds fascinating though.
ReplyDeleteBetty
book first, then movie!
DeleteBook almost always ends up better indeed.
ReplyDeleteyep - and I turned the pages fast on this one
DeleteI'll get round to reading, and watching, this at some point. I love the idea of the unreliable narrator. The reviews in this country weren't quite so good - mostly because British reviewers felt the book was intrinsically British and couldn't convert to the US setting.
ReplyDeleteI can understand their bias, but it worked fine
DeleteI'll have to check it out on NetFlix.
ReplyDeleteshould show up there soon enough
DeleteSounds like a good movie and book
ReplyDeleteyep - put it in the queue
DeleteJustin Theroux has a creepy look to him. I'm sure he was perfect in that role. I didn't read the book or see the movie, but I appreciate your review.
ReplyDeleteyep - he's a tad sinister and does a good job
DeleteGreat review! It's on my list to read and to see! Thank you Joanne.
ReplyDeleteglad I could help
DeleteI read the book and hope to see the movie. Sounds like it will be worth my time when I do. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteI'll be curious as to your reaction
DeleteIt must have been a good book and hope the movie is a success. Much talent there I believe.
ReplyDeleteYvonne.
Emily Blunt is always a winner
Delete